Hi @sergey.manevitch, great question! Yes, I should clarify. When I said that Fe (ppm) isn’t important, I meant the absolute value. Let’s say you have 100 ppm. Is that high? Low? It varies by OEM and application type. Now say 500 hours later, the value is still 100 ppm. That’s good! This means there are no additional wear metals that have been generated in the application.
By contrast, I could have a value of 80 ppm, which is less. But if 200 hours ago the value was 10 ppm, than this unit is wearing at a significantly faster rate.
That’s really what I meant – we should be focussing on the rate of change of the number, rather than the absolute value.
Lubrication Expert
Report
There was a problem reporting this post.
Block Member?
Please confirm you want to block this member.
You will no longer be able to:
See blocked member's posts
Mention this member in posts
Invite this member to groups
Message this member
Add this member as a connection
Please note:
This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin.
Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.